Draft
Introduction
A homogenized culture has said to be the resultant of globalization,
along with the facilitation of media. Globalization is also seen as attempts to
undermine,
devaluate or eradicate their cultural existence by many individuals (Berry,
2008). Some of the repercussions
are change of attitudes and one of which being apathetic in native language due
to the rise of English. Fortunately, this alteration in attitudes can still be reversed
with the help of
media, government bodies and public.
English is a language used by people whenever there is
a need to converse with persons beyond their own linguistic community. The term ‘linguistic
imperialism’ is being used by Hjarvard (n.d.) to describe this phenomenon. It
reduces the authenticity of native languages as the trend of including English
words into daily conversations of people from different countries becomes more
prevalent. Furthermore, the extensive
borrowing of words and expressions from English shows the importance of this
language to the World (Jensen, 2013). As a result, the fear of losing
native languages escalates.
The issue is further aggravated by the acquisition of single national language
during the process of nation-state formation. Additionally, some countries
banned the use of dialects and languages of the minorities (Hjarvard, n.d.).
Solutions
Governments and the public
Political parties play a prominent role in protecting
their own native languages too. The integration of dialects preservation into
Norway’s national linguistic policy is an example of governmental bodies’
contributions (Hjarvard, no date). Learning of native languages such as
dialects could be introduced in schools and this approach may be feasible
because governments are more influential. There is also a possibility that this
approach may backfire as public (like parents) especially in the context of
Singapore, may view learning of such ‘irrelevant’ dialects as downgrading and
useless. Thus, public can adopt an informal approach to save the native
languages from extinction.
First Peoples Worldwide, a global institution founded
by the natives is an example of public’s approach to advocate for culture and
language conservation. This organization aims to circulate native knowledge,
raise awareness and maintain the presence of the indigenous community which
includes linguistic preservation (First Peoples Worldwide, 2012).
With the collaboration of public and governmental
bodies, the likelihood of language extinction is significantly diminished.
Media
Back then, indoctrination of societal values into the
younger generations was executed
by religion and educational systems. However, this role has been replaced by
mass media which is now one of the most prominent and significant force for mass education (Firouzeh,
2004). People are now voluntarily or involuntarily exposed to cultural “messages” which do not
belong to them due to the expeditious development of mass media or internet
(Samovar & Porter, 2005).
Media is seen as a double edged sword; an influential
tool that can be used to transmit English knowledge but at the same time,
possesses the considerable potential to disseminate knowledge about the various
cultures and languages (Hjarvard, n.d.).
A conscious effort should be engaged by people from the media industry
to promote native languages which can be achieved through music or even variety
programs that educate the public on different cultures and languages.
Conclusion
The loss of language should never be underestimated.
As mentioned in the newsletter of First Peoples Worldwide, “the loss of a
language represents the loss of much of that community’s cultural heritage,
autonomy, power and connectivity”. Hence, media, political parties and the
public have to their part to prevent this loss.
Rather than viewing English as detrimental, some
informants of Johnson (2009) regard globalization as a process which associates
people from distinct background and enables the interchange of notions from one
culture to another. Though English competency is crucial to ensure effective
intercultural communication, the proficiency of native languages should be equally prioritized and
disseminated to prevent extinctions.
Berry, J.W. (2008). Globalisation and acculturation.
International Journal of Intercultural relations, 32. 328-336.
Hjarvard, S. (n.d.). The Globalization of Language:
How the Media Contribute to the Spread of English and the Emergence of
Medialects. 75-97.
Firouzeh, N. (2004). The Globalisation and
Homogenisation of Culture: The Role of Mass Medias in Developing Countries.
Human Ecology Special Issue No. 12: 235-239.
Johnson,
A. (2009). The Rise of English: The Language of Globalization in China and the
European Union. Macalester International Vol. 22. 131-168.
Samovor,
L.A. & Porter, R.E. (2005). Understanding culture: Alternative views of
reality (5th ed.). Australia, Canada, Mexico, Singapore, Spain,
United Kingdom, United States: Thomson.
Jensen, L.T. (2013). Coping with the dominance of
English: a view from Denmark. Retrieved from http://www.macmillandictionaryblog.com/coping-with-the-dominance-of-english-denmark
First
Peoples Worldwide. (2013). Celebrating and Preserving Indigenous Language.
Retrieved from http://firstpeoples.org/wp/celebrating-and-preserving-indigenous-language/
No comments:
Post a Comment